Someone bashing Serena on your timeline? Slide them the link to one of these and keep it moving.
Thứ Sáu, 10 tháng 7, 2015
Thứ Năm, 9 tháng 7, 2015
With England and Australia going head to head in the Ashes, we decided to see how much our American cousins knew about all things cricket.
What are these people doing?
Ben: Waving to the fans.
Alex: Calling a wicket??
Spencer: Playing cricket!
Lauren: Pledging their allegiance to Kate Middleton?
Conz: Getting ready for a group high five.
Correct answer: They are appealing to the umpire as they think the batsman should be out.
Laurence Griffiths / Getty Images
What does "LBW" stand for?
Whitney: Long Brilliant Win
Ben: Last Best Wicket?
Alex: Leg Before Wicket I think??
Lauren: Little Bloody Wanker (these are British words I know).
Correct answer: Leg Before Wicket. This is when the ball is prevented from hitting the stumps by hitting the leg of the batsman.
Charlie Crowhurst / Getty Images
This dude in the hat is an umpire. What does this hand gesture signify?
Conz: "You were ~this~ close to scoring."
Whitney: A goal?
Alex: "Please, rain gods, let it rain so I can go home we've been here for four days already."
Lauren: Out of bounds, maybe? Way more concerned about the stuff on his lips.
Correct answer: A six. (i.e. the batsman hit the ball over the boundary without it bouncing – this is worth six runs.)
Tom Shaw / Getty Images
How about this one?
Ben: First down.
Leo: Pee break.
Alex: One run?
Lauren: Ten points to Gryffindor!!
Daniela: He'd like ONE cup of tea.
Correct answer: The bastman is out.
Gareth Copley / Getty Images
There’s a hell of a lot more to the sport than tossing up a pom-pom.
So, you've heard of cheerleading, right?
FOX
Whether you are a cheerleader or know one, you are probably aware of the ~stereotypes~ surrounding cheerleading.
Universal Pictures
For example, maybe you've heard the long-running argument about whether or not cheerleading is a sport.
The CW
Or possibly, you've rolled your eyes more than once at a movie that portrayed cheerleaders as ditzy. UGH.
New Line Cinema
The former FIFA Executive Committee member helped U.S. authorities with their investigation into corruption in soccer’s governing body after he pleaded guilty to bribery, money laundering, and tax evasion.
FIFA has banned former Executive Committee member Chuck Blazer from soccer-related activities for life, the organization said in a statement Thursday.
Julian Finney / Getty Images
Blazer pleaded guilty to bribery, tax evasion, and money laundering charges in 2013 and worked undercover in soccer's global governing body helping U.S. prosecutors gather evidence of corruption from 2011.
FIFA's statement said:
Mr Blazer committed many and various acts of misconduct continuously and repeatedly during his time as an official in different high-ranking and influential positions at FIFA and CONCACAF. In his positions as a football official, he was a key player in schemes involving the offer, acceptance, payment and receipt of undisclosed and illegal payments, bribes and kickbacks as well as other money-making schemes.
The violations of FIFA's code of conduct relate to rules around loyalty, confidentiality, duty of disclosure, conflicts of interest, offering and accepting gifts and other benefits, and bribery and corruption.
The ban went into effect Thursday. Blazer, 70, was also the second highest-ranking official in CONCACAF, the soccer confederation for the Caribbean and North and Central America, from 1990 to 2011.
FIFA's investigations into Blazer were suspended in May 2013 due to the New Yorker's "ill-health", but they were resumed in December 2014.
The statement said that the decision had been made by the adjudicatory chamber of its Ethics Committee — chaired by Hans-Joachim Eckert. That committee was the center of its own controversy surrounding its report into an investigation into corruption in bids for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups, which was rejected by the lawyer who carried it out.
The FIFA statement added: "The decision was taken on the basis of investigations carried out by the investigatory chamber of the ethics committee in response to the final report of the CONCACAF integrity committee and the latest facts presented by the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York."
LINK: Mr. Ten Percent: The Man Who Built — And Bilked — American Soccer
The battle to keep the Olympics out of Boston has become a little contentious after organizers staged a protest outside the mayor’s house.
Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh.
Maddie Meyer / Getty Images
WASHINGTON — The most prominent nonprofit protesting the Olympic Games coming to Boston has distanced itself from the efforts of the Black Lives Matter movement, after the group staged a protest outside the home of Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh.
No Boston Olympics, the nonprofit, is perhaps the most prominent group taking a stance against the Olympics, saying the Olympics will be a financial burden on the backs of Massachusetts taxpayers for years to come.
"We were not a part of the Black Lives Matter protest in front of the Mayor's house and do not believe it's the best way to communicate concerns on Boston2024," Kelley Gossett, co-chair of the nonprofit No Boston Olympics said in an email to BuzzFeed News. "We understand many feel frustrated by the potential negative impacts on a host community, and certainly share in that sentiment. However, a disruptive early morning protest does not further that discussion most constructively."
Protesters associated with Black Lives Matter are promising more demonstrations, though. Their efforts this year have included a widely-covered human barricade, which shut down Interstate 93 during morning rush hour in January. The protest at Walsh's house also drew headlines — and the ire of the mayor.
"I don't agree with people going to people's houses, protesting. On the street, I have babies, I have seniors. At 4 a.m., I just don't think it's effective," Walsh told the Boston Herald. "I don't think it's a productive way to get your message across to anybody."
"I don't dodge meetings," Walsh went on. "I don't think you win an argument by disrupting everyone on the street or out in the neighborhood."
Protesters with the Black Lives Matter movement organizing in Boston are part of the growing number of people in the city and throughout the region who do not want the Olympic Games to come to Boston. The move to apply public pressure on Walsh comes as the movement is still gaining traction in Boston, a city known for its troubled history with race.
Black Lives Matter Boston said it has been lauded on its efforts from the movement in Ferguson all the way to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where amid protest, the Olympic Games will take place next summer.
"Displacement has accompanied every Olympic Games," the Boston movement said in a statement on its Facebook page. "Specifically, we recognize the 30,000 residents made homeless by the Atlanta Centennial Games; we are witnessing in real time the wholesale destruction of Rio de Janeiro's neighborhoods. Likewise, we reject the continued diversion of Boston's limited public funds for private projects when already one-third of Boston's public schools have no physical education and roughly one-third of Boston's children currently live in poverty."
Some observers believe the movement's involvement with the Olympic Games is a diversion for Black Lives Matter, whose focus nationwide has zeroed in on racism and fighting for justice for victims of excessive force by police.
"The idea that the Olympics would be out of the purview of Black Lives Matter completely false," said Daunasia Yancey, lead organizer of the movement in Boston. Yancey said, pointing to the issues of gentrification, police surveillance and displacement that have ravaged black lives. "It's basically a land grab."
Dave Zirin, an author who has written extensively on the Olympic Games' effect on the poor, including Brazil's Dance With the Devil, said public welfare for sports stadiums "has become the substitute for anything resembling an urban policy in this country for the last 25 years."
"They have been used as a tool to uproot poor disproportionately black populations in deindustrializing cities from coast to coast," Zirin wrote in an email to BuzzFeed News. "I've seen it again and again: the people who get hurt when the Olympics come to town are the ones most vulnerable. It doesn't only make sense for the Black Lives Matter movement to target the Olympics. It's a question of stopping the physical repression of the black community in Boston, before the Olympics give a pretext to accelerate those very attacks."
Yancey criticized neutrality and relative silence groups like the Boston chapters of the NAACP National Urban League, organizations which have thus far not opposed the Olympics.
Yancey does not anticipating a meeting with the mayor, but has attacked him on his contradictory communication on whether he read documents submitted by Boston 2024 to the U.S. Olympic Committee.
As for Boston 2024, Yancey said she'd meet with them — "They love to have meetings to say that they had them," — but with one stipulation: to cancel the bid.
"Otherwise I don't know what we're talking about."
Đăng ký:
Bài đăng (Atom)
